SaaS & product
From customer call to shipped feature, one graph connects it all.
Fivo is an AI knowledge graph for SaaS and product teams. It links what customers say on calls and in support with what your team plans, builds and ships, and with what each customer pays. Ask “who asked for SSO and how much revenue is behind it?” and get the answer with its sources.
14 days of full Pro access. No card needed.
Because the request, the debate and the decision happen in different tools, months apart. The customer asked on a call, the team argued in Slack and the ticket in Jira says “see thread”.
Into call recordings, support tickets and a dozen Slack channels. Nobody can count how many customers asked for the same thing.
Without evidence, priorities follow whoever spoke last or loudest.
The decision was made in a meeting six months ago, and the people in it have moved on to other work.
Product ships, but the context about who asked and what was promised never reaches the customer team.
What Fivo builds for you
| In your graph | Where it comes from | What you can do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Feature requests | Customer calls, Intercom, Zendesk | Count requests per feature, with the accounts behind them |
| Revenue per account | Stripe | Weigh each request by plan, MRR and churn date |
| Decisions | Meetings, Notion, Confluence, PR discussions | See why something was built, who decided and when |
| Work in progress | Jira, Linear, GitHub | Connect each request to the ticket and the PR that closed it |
| Bugs and known issues | Intercom, Zendesk, GitHub | Know what's broken, who is affected and what was promised |
| Churn and expansion signals | All sources | Get flagged on accounts evaluating alternatives, downgrading or asking for more |
How it works
Add your roadmap, code, support and billing tools, such as Linear, GitHub, Intercom and Stripe. Fivo joins customer and team calls itself.
Requests, decisions, tickets and customers become linked facts, each with a date and a source.
Ask in Fivo, or from Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or your coding agent over MCP.
Integrations
Connect one and the graph starts building from your next call.
Your AI, with full context
Your agents re-read docs, tickets and threads on every task. That burns tokens, and they still miss why things were built the way they were. Fivo gives them the decision, the customer requests and the revenue behind each feature as compact, sourced facts: about 250 tokens instead of 8,000. Agents spend their context on the work, not on searching for it.
Example
In Claude Code, “Can we remove the legacy CSV importer?” Claude checks Fivo first: 3 accounts still use it, €40k ARR, and a promise to Acme to keep it until Q1.
Use cases
Ask how many customers requested a feature and Fivo lists the accounts, their plan and their MRR from Stripe, with links to the calls and tickets where they asked. Prioritise with evidence, not volume.
Each spec change is linked to the meeting or thread where it was decided, and to who was there. Six months later, the answer to “why is it like this?” takes seconds.
Support sees the customer's history, open bugs and any fix that was promised before replying. Customers stop hearing “let me check with the team”.
Fivo drafts release notes from merged PRs and closed requests, and lists which customers asked for each change so CS can tell them.
Fivo flags when two people or squads are building overlapping things, before both ship.
Over MCP, Cursor or Claude Code can ask the graph why a system works the way it does before changing it.
Ask your graph
Ask Fivo
“Who asked for SSO?”
Fivo answers
14 accounts, 9 of them on the Business plan, €212k ARR in total. The most recent ask came from Acme on Tuesday's call.
Ask Fivo
“Why did we drop CSV export from v2?”
Fivo answers
It was decided in the 4 March planning call (Ana, Jordi, Marc). The reason: low usage, about 3% of accounts, and a planned API instead.
Ask Fivo
“What did we promise customers for Q4?”
Fivo answers
Seven promises across five accounts. Two of them, bulk import and an audit log, aren't on the current roadmap.
Fivo vs the alternatives
| Feedback tool | Wiki or docs | Fivo graph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Captures requests from calls automatically | No, someone logs them | No | Yes |
| Links request → decision → ticket → PR | Partially | No | Yes |
| Keeps decision history | No | If someone writes it | Automatically, with the source |
| Answers questions in plain language | No | Search only | Yes |
| Works with your AI and coding agents | No | Limited | Yes, over MCP |
FAQ
Updated 2026-10-11
The second best is today. Connect Jira and Intercom, and by tomorrow you'll know who asked for what.
14 days. Full Pro access. No credit card.SOC 2, GDPR, EU-hosted